tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7351904589099176534.post5598922257151386047..comments2023-10-25T05:21:38.824-07:00Comments on The Lockerbie Divide: PI/995 Label IssuesCaustic Logichttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03082923821952309709noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7351904589099176534.post-80310250676328563002010-03-10T16:18:23.085-08:002010-03-10T16:18:23.085-08:00The "P" is PI is for "property.&quo...The "P" is PI is for "property." The numbers are supposed to be sequential.Caustic Logichttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03082923821952309709noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7351904589099176534.post-29338403664498026752010-03-10T00:30:13.830-08:002010-03-10T00:30:13.830-08:00Bollier:
1st: top of the line says Police No. the...Bollier: <br /><i>1st: top of the line says Police No. then was written Label: "PT" no.95 = (PT/95); then chanched on Label *PL" no.95 = (PL/95); then chanched again on Label "PI" no.995 = (PI/995) !<br />*(The marking *PL" was not used in the Dr. Hayes/Feraday's examinations report, therefore was changed on letters "PI" !);</i> <br /><br />Previously I'd seen you go from PT to PI. It's possible, but do you even know what these letters mean? I don't know what the P means (production?) but the I is from "I sector" where it was supposedly found. They only ran 11 sectors (A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H,I,J,K). PT items are removed from previously gathered evidence at the lab. The only PTs I can recall are PT/35 and PT/2, both pulled from this piece PI/995. Oh, and PT/1, which was actually an intact control sample version of the manual PT/2 was found to come from. (that's genuinely odd, look it up, PT/1 changed to PR/1111)<br /><br />So, it was first pulled from something else and labeled PT, then decided to make it seem found on its own in I sector. And then it has other things yet planted inside of it. That's possible. <br /><br />But PT to PL to PI? That can only barely work just visually, and given that PL means nothing, I don't see a reason. Also, how the hell did you find this out? Some insider who saw each change told you? Sheer logic? It's defective if so. <br /><br /><i>2nd: Production, Case Against; ....<br />3rd: there's was a first date of 13.1.89, then was later chanched to 17.1.89 !;</i> <br /><br />It still says 13/1. <br /><br /><i>4th: Description of article: "cloth" (charred), then was later overwritten with "DEBRIS" and in brackets, (charred) !;</i> <br /><br />Noted. <br /><br /><i>5th: where Found: I, sector, 502-858;</i> <br /><br />Here invisible, but yes, the location in I sector. <br /><br /><i>6th: two signatures from Thomas Gilchrist and Thomas McColm. To demonstrate the liability the label was later then additionally signed by (5) further officials: Cal Mentoso (phonetic), Derek Henderson, Tom Hayes, Allan Feraday and Ron McManus...</i> <br /><br />I've heard that, and I know you're not getting that off this label, or you wouldn't be saying (phonetic) like it says in the transcripts. Therein it does seem attached to this label (not Mentoso, read carefully) but the others are (read?) by Gilchrist. But all I can see is the three Thomases (McColm, Gilchrist, Hayes), and maybe: <br />TCP Scribble <br />and <br />MOD PER 16 D & G <br />Oh, that's Dumfries and Galloway,just got that. Need to update. <br /><br /><i>Question: Did this persons had to take the responsibility on themselves, if the criminal fraud would be noticed ?</i> <br /><br />Sorry, I'm too busy considering the bogus evidence planted inside this collar to worry about some silly letter-changing fraud on the tag. <br /><br />You need more exclamation marks!!!Caustic Logichttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03082923821952309709noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7351904589099176534.post-3992985737586156102010-03-08T02:24:39.182-08:002010-03-08T02:24:39.182-08:00Thanks, Ebol, for the comment! I've wanted to ...Thanks, Ebol, for the comment! I've wanted to discuss the tag and your notions on it. I'll have to come back to it later, however. Regards.Caustic Logichttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03082923821952309709noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7351904589099176534.post-29164514464226372542010-03-08T01:26:07.151-08:002010-03-08T01:26:07.151-08:00Who changed the Police-Label 168 and why ?
(comput...Who changed the Police-Label 168 and why ?<br />(computer translation Babylon german/english)<br /><br />That is the key for the Lockerbie-Affair !<br />7 Scottish Officials are still protected ! A Dishonor for the Scottish Justice Secretary Kenny MacAskill !<br /><br />The Police Label no.168 was the basis in the context for the fraud:<br />Before Dr. Hayes and Allen Feraday had completed their examination's by RARDE, at November 1990, some Label's and Documents became different "alteration's" (among other things: Label 168, Label DP/137, Memorandum no.333 and Photomontage no.329, etc) !!!<br />The RARDE Draft Report was opened by Thomas Stuart Hayes and Allen Feraday on 15th November 1990, before the Label no.168 was chanched!!!<br /><br />Detective constable of Strathclyde police Thomas Gilchrist and ex police officer Thomas McColm were numbers of officer who became involved in the inquiry in the aftermath of PanAm 103. Both officer was involved in the recovery of certain debris and personal belongings.<br />In the course of duties the officers take part in searches in the field down in Lockerbie and the area. There was a property centre in Lockerbie called Dextar. The duties was carry out there. For the purpose of ingathering aircraft parts a property center was also in Cumbria called Longtown. All parts was marked with a Strathclyde police label from its own force.<br /><br />The Label Number 168 was signed from officers Thomas Gilchrist and Thomas Duncan McColm on 13th of January 1989.<br />Information appears on the face of the Label, police no.168:<br /><br />1st: top of the line says Police No. then was written Label: "PT" no.95 = (PT/95); then chanched on Label *PL" no.95 = (PL/95); then chanched again on Label "PI" no.995 = (PI/995) !<br />*(The marking *PL" was not used in the Dr. Hayes/Feraday's examinations report, therefore was changed on letters "PI" !);<br /><br />2nd: Production, Case Against; ....<br />3rd: there's was a first date of 13.1.89, then was later chanched to 17.1.89 !;<br />4th: Description of article: "cloth" (charred), then was later overwritten with "DEBRIS" and in brackets, (charred) !;<br />5th: where Found: I, sector, 502-858;<br />6th: two signatures from Thomas Gilchrist and Thomas McColm. To demonstrate the liability the label was later then additionally signed by (5) further officials: Cal Mentoso (phonetic), Derek Henderson, Tom Hayes, Allan Feraday and Ron McManus...<br /><br />Question: Did this persons had to take the responsibility on themselves, if the criminal fraud would be noticed ? And had every of these officials to secure himself face to face of the others ?<br />It is strange and not normal that the altered police label no.168 (PI/995) was signed by 7 officials !<br />(Lord Advocate Fraser's order was that police labels must by signed by 2 officials).<br />The 7 Officials knows obviously about the altering of Label 168, by Allen Feraday !<br /><br />The date 13.1.89 at the bottom left hand corner vertically on the label no. 168, the grid reference and the word (charred) is the writing from officer Gilchrist (writing analysis).<br />The manipulated label mark: to PI/995, and the overwritten word "DEBRIS" is the writing of Allen Feraday...<br />The fraud with the manipulated MST-13 timer fragment (PT/35) which was the only piece of evidence, brought Libya with the Lockerbie-Tragedy in connection, are in the context regarded:<br /><br />> with the altered label No.168 of Strathclyde police;<br />> the label DP/137 of (Dumfries & Galloway Constabulary police);<br />> the doubtful back-posted MEMORANDUM (Prod.333) of Allen Feraday (RARDE) at Inspector William Williamson;<br />> the missed Examination's page No.56; > the additional Examinations page No.51, of Dr. Thomas Heyes (RARDE);<br />> the photomontage (photo no.329). Ref. PP'8932, PI/995;<br />> and the delivery of a MST-13 Circuit board (prototype) of Swiss Police (BUPO) at Scottish police/FBI, (Affidavit from eng. Lumpert, 18th July, 2007).<br /><br />by Edwin and Mahnaz Bollier, MEBO Ltd., Switzerlandebolhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12681382726604052927noreply@blogger.com