Helsinki Warning Re-Considered, pt 3

28 September 2010

<< See part 2 - distribution and assessment

Would it / did it serve as an effective warning?
Actually, I'm not up to filling in this post at the moment, but I've chosen to make them sequential. If anyone else cares to write up a guest post to address this question, I'd be happy to post it. Submission deadline is just before I finally get around to it. No rush I should think - if I've bought some time, I'll take it.

(this text to be replaced)
Go to part 4: Can we be sure it was a coincidental hoax? >>

No comments: